Market Positioning Policies
Aligning Price with Position
Your pricing policies must reinforce your market positioning. A premium brand that discounts heavily undermines its positioning. A value brand that refuses to negotiate loses to more aggressive competitors. Policies provide the guardrails that keep pricing aligned with strategy.
Premium Position Policies
If you're positioned as a premium offering, policies should protect price integrity:
- Strict discount limits: Shallow maximum discounts (5-10%) even for large accounts
- No promotional discounting: Avoid sales, deals, and time-limited price reductions
- List price emphasis: Train sales to sell from list; discounts are rare exceptions
- Value justification required: Any discount requires documented competitive pressure
- Bundle rather than discount: Offer added value rather than lower prices Premium policies can feel constraining, but they serve a purpose. Customers expect premium brands to hold price. Discounting signals desperation or overpricing—neither consistent with premium positioning. Sales teams initially resist but often find that firm pricing backed by value communication closes deals that would have been lost to discount requests.
Value Leader Policies
If you're positioned on value/price, policies enable competitive pricing while protecting floors:
- Competitive matching authority: Sales can match documented competitor prices
- Volume discount emphasis: Deep discounts tied to volume commitments
- Floor protection: Absolute minimum prices below which no deal is approved
- Cost-to-serve awareness: Different floors for different customers based on true costs
- Efficient pricing: Streamlined approval for standard discount ranges Positioning-Specific Policy Guidelines
Position
Max Standard Discount
Promotional Activity
Exception Philosophy
Premium
5-10%
Rare; value-add focused
Highly restrictive
Upper Mid-Market
10-15%
Limited; strategic only
Moderately restrictive
Mid-Market
15-20%
Moderate; competitive
Balanced flexibility
Value Leader
20-30%
Frequent; price-focused
Volume-based flexibility
Economy
10-15%
Everyday low price
Minimal; already at floor
Multi-Brand and Multi-Tier Strategies
Many companies operate multiple brands or tiers at different positions. Policies must maintain separation between tiers to prevent cannibalization.
- Price gaps: Maintain minimum percentage gaps between tiers (typically 15-25%)
- Feature differentiation: Each tier has distinct features that justify its price point
- Sales channel separation: Different tiers may use different channels to reduce comparison
- Migration policies: Clear rules for moving customers between tiers
Case Study: Tier Protection: The Hotel Example A hotel chain operates three tiers: luxury, upscale, and select-service. Policies maintain tier separation: Luxury properties never discount below 40% premium to upscale. Upscale maintains 25% premium to select-service. Each tier has distinct amenities (spa, restaurant, room size) that justify gaps. Loyalty program benefits differ by tier—luxury members receive suite upgrades, select-service members receive points. When occupancy is low, properties are authorized to add value (breakfast, parking) rather than cut rates that would blur tier distinctions.
Key Takeaways
- Pricing policies must reinforce market positioning—premium brands need different policies than value leaders
- Premium positions require strict discount limits and emphasis on value over price
- Value positions enable competitive pricing while protecting absolute floors
- Multi-tier strategies require policies that maintain separation and prevent cannibalization

