When to Chain Prompts
Not every task benefits from chaining. Learning to recognize when chaining adds value versus when it adds unnecessary complexity is a crucial skill.
Clear Indicators for Chaining
1. Tasks with Distinct Phases
If your task naturally breaks into phases with different requirements, chain:
Example: Document Processing
- Phase 1: Extract information (needs the full document)
- Phase 2: Validate extracted data (needs just the extracted data)
- Phase 3: Transform to target format (needs validated data + format spec)
Each phase has different context needs and success criteria.
2. Quality-Critical Outputs
When quality matters more than speed, add review steps:
Generate → Review → Revise → Final Check
This review step couldn't happen if generation and review were combined.
3. Tasks Requiring External Data
When you need to incorporate information from outside the prompt:
Generate Query → Fetch Data → Process with Data → Generate Output
Even if you're simulating the data fetch, separating this step makes the workflow realistic and testable.
4. Long or Complex Outputs
For outputs longer than ~1000 words, breaking into sections usually improves quality:
Create Outline → Write Section 1 → Write Section 2 → ... → Combine → Edit
5. Tasks with Validation Requirements
If you need to verify outputs meet specific criteria:
Generate → Validate Format → Validate Content → Approve or Retry
When NOT to Chain
Simple Transformations
If the task is straightforward, a single prompt is more efficient:
- Translating a paragraph
- Summarizing a short document
- Converting between data formats
- Answering a factual question
When Speed is Critical
Each chain step adds latency. For real-time applications, minimize steps:
- Chatbot responses
- Live coding assistance
- Interactive Q&A
When Context is Unified
If all the information needed fits comfortably in one prompt and the task is cohesive, don't artificially split it:
Don't chain: Analyzing a short product review for sentiment Do chain: Analyzing 50 reviews, categorizing issues, and generating a response strategy
The Decision Framework
Ask these questions:
| Question | If Yes | If No |
|---|---|---|
| Does the task have distinct phases? | Consider chaining | Might be single prompt |
| Do later steps need to validate earlier steps? | Chain | Single prompt okay |
| Is the output longer than 1000 words? | Consider chaining sections | Single prompt okay |
| Do you need to incorporate external data? | Chain around data fetches | Single prompt okay |
| Is this time-critical (< 2 seconds)? | Minimize chain length | Chain freely |
| Could errors in early steps cascade? | Chain with validation | Single prompt okay |
Hybrid Approaches
Sometimes the answer is a short chain rather than no chain or a complex chain:
Two-Step Chains
Many workflows benefit from just two steps:
Generate and Review
Step 1: Generate initial output
Step 2: Review and improve the output
Analyze and Act
Step 1: Analyze the situation
Step 2: Generate recommendations based on analysis
Extract and Transform
Step 1: Extract relevant information
Step 2: Transform into target format
Exercise: Chain or Not?
For each scenario, decide if you would chain and why:
Suggested answers:
- SINGLE - Simple, direct transformation
- CHAIN - Long output benefits from section-by-section generation
- SINGLE - Factual question with clear answer
- CHAIN - Distinct phases: analyze, identify, draft
- SINGLE - Short input, direct task
- CHAIN - Three distinct operations with validation between them
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Chaining has costs:
- Latency: Each step adds processing time
- Complexity: More steps mean more things that can break
- Token usage: Context often gets repeated between steps
Chaining has benefits:
- Quality: Focused steps produce better outputs
- Reliability: Validation catches errors early
- Flexibility: Easier to modify individual steps
- Debuggability: Can identify where problems occur
The rule: Chain when the quality/reliability benefits outweigh the latency/complexity costs.
Key Takeaways
- Chain when tasks have distinct phases with different requirements
- Chain when you need validation between steps
- Chain when outputs are long or complex
- Don't chain simple, direct transformations
- Consider two-step chains as a middle ground
- Always weigh quality benefits against complexity costs
In the next module, we'll dive into the mechanics of actually connecting prompts together.

